Sunday, 23 February 2025
Home Topics Climate UK’s climate action plan inadequate and unlawful, campaign groups tell court
ClimateNews

UK’s climate action plan inadequate and unlawful, campaign groups tell court

93
A climate activist demonstrates outside the high court in London, Britain, February 20, 2024. REUTERS/Isabel Infantes

By Sam Tobin

LONDON (Reuters) – Britain’s new climate action plan is unlawful because ministers were given misleading information about the prospects of meeting legally-binding emissions targets, three environmental campaign groups told London’s High Court on Tuesday.

Friends of the Earth, ClientEarth and the Good Law Project are taking legal action over carbon budgets set by the government to meet Britain’s target of net zero by 2050.

The case comes amid concerns Britain has lost its position as a global leader on climate action and as environmental groups around the world step up legal challenges to press governments and corporations to do more to tackle climate change.

A similar case brought by the three groups in 2022, after which the High Court ruled Britain had breached legislation designed to help reach the 2015 Paris Agreement goal of containing temperatures within 1.5 degrees Celsius of pre-industrial levels.

The British government had to revise its plans, which were signed off last year. But the groups say the new plan is also unlawful because then energy minister Grant Shapps was not told of the risk that policies to reduce emissions could not be delivered.

Friends of the Earth’s lawyer David Wolfe said Britain’s Climate Change Committee warned last year there were credible policies in place for less than 20% of the reductions required to meet the carbon budget for the period 2033-2037.

He added in court filings that Shapps “proceeded on the assumption that the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases from all of the proposals and policies … would all be delivered in full when there was no evidential basis”.

Lawyers representing the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, however, said Shapps did not assume emission reductions would be delivered in full.

Jonathan Moffett also said in court filings that Shapps’ decision required “an evaluative, predictive judgement as to what may transpire up to 14 years into the future”, which was a matter for elected politicians rather the courts.

(Reporting by Sam Tobin; Editing by Ros Russell)

Related Articles

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum speaks as he attends a signing ceremony with members of the West Virginia Congressional Delegation at the EPA headquarters in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 18, 2025. REUTERS/Kent Nishimura/File Photo

US energy council chief says power plants to produce 15% more electricity

By Valerie Volcovici WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. Interior Secretary and co-chair of...

Lilium burnt through huge sums while trying to develop its jet (AFP)

German flying taxi start-up’s rescue deal collapses

A German flying taxi start-up said on Friday it would halt operations...

Cuba has inaugurated a new solar energy park in the capital Havana (AFP)

Cuba opens solar park hoping to stave off blackouts

Cuba on Friday unveiled a new solar energy park in the capital...

FILE PHOTO: Cranes unload imported iron ore from a cargo vessel at a port in Lianyungang, Jiangsu province, China October 27, 2019. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo

Iron ore heads for weekly gain on brightening demand outlook, China stimulus hopes

By Amy Lv and Lewis Jackson BEIJING (Reuters) -Iron ore futures prices...

Login into your Account

Please login to like, dislike or bookmark this article.