Thursday, 5 December 2024
Home Topics Climate Smelly Serbian wastewater adds to environmental woes
ClimateEnvironmentNews

Smelly Serbian wastewater adds to environmental woes

46
Waste water feeds into the Sava River in Belgrade, Serbia, February 10, 2024. Around 70 percent of settlements in Serbia, including its capital Belgrade, do not have waste water treatment, and the improvements cannot be made without a comprehensive plan that is missing, the State Audit Institution (DRI) said in a report. Other countries in the Western Balkans are also suffering from accumulated environmental problems. REUTERS/Djordje Kojadinovic

BELGRADE – Next to a block of new high-rises in Belgrade’s upscale Waterfront neighbourhood, a foul-smelling stream spews sewage directly into the Sava River, one of scores of outlets polluting the city’s waters.

Belgraders who own floating summer homes on the river say they fear to swim there anymore. Some fish stocks are depleting, anglers say.

Serbia’s capital is famous for its air pollution, caused by coal plants and old cars. But the trouble does not end there.

It dumps enough untreated sewage each year to fill 60,000 Olympic swimming pools, government data show, threatening wildlife downstream and contributing to the city’s reputation as one of the worst polluters in Europe.

The problem, caused by a lack of treatment plants, further complicates Serbia’s bid to the join the European Union, which demands far stricter standards than those enforced in Belgrade and across the Balkans, experts say.

“It stinks. Every year is worse than the previous one, we do not even buy fish from the Danube and Sava,” said Dejan Nikolic, who owns a house on the Sava. He has not swum in the river for years, he said.

Before it joins the EU, Serbia must aim to process over 90% of urban wastewater. The figure is currently 15%, government data show. Other Balkan countries like Albania and Bosnia Herzegovina do not fare much better.

“Serbia ranks lowest (in Europe) in this category,” said Mirko Popovic of the Belgrade-based Renewables and Environmental Regulatory Institute.

In a report last month, the State Audit Institution said 70% of settlements have no access to wastewater treatment. Meeting these and other environmental standards will cost Serbia around €15 billion ($16 billion), government officials say.

Serbia’s government has until 2040 to build treatment plants for towns and cities. It says it is on track and has already invested €4 billion.

The government is “working intensively” on measures to protect water from pollution, the environment ministry told Reuters. “These are very complex infrastructure projects, with a long period of implementation.”

“CLEAN SERBIA”

Serbia began EU accession talks a decade ago. Economic, judicial and legal reforms are required, as is repairing thorny relations with neighbouring Kosovo.

Serbia’s agricultural economy industrialised quickly after World War Two. Now the skyline of Belgrade is dotted with smokestacks from Communist-era factories. Smog frequently engulfs the city. The country ranks one of the highest in the world for premature deaths attributed to pollution.

Laws dictate that industry must treat its waste, but few have access to processing plants. Producers of food, textiles and pharmaceuticals often dump wastewater directly into sewers.

Out of nine wastewater projects due in 2023, six were behind schedule, the state audit report said.

Three years ago, Serbia signed a €3.2-billion deal with China Road and Bridge Corporation to improve waste utilities and sewers as part of the “Clean Serbia” project.

Dusan Radonjic, assistant minister for infrastructure, told state RTS TV last month that 5,000 km (3,100 miles) of sewers and 159 wastewater processing facilities were planned as part of the project.

But residents say it is happening too slowly.

Speaking by the sewer outlet in Belgrade’s Waterfront neighbourhood, Vladimir Stakic, publisher of Serbia’s Angling Magazine, says he has stopped eating fish from the area.

Carp and catfish, which feed on the waste, are abundant, while whitefish, pike and zander are harder to find in polluted areas.

“I am shocked whenever I see people fishing here, metres from a sewage outlet,” he said.

Related Articles

FILE PHOTO: Tesla electric vehicles use a Tesla supercharging station in Union City, New Jersey, U.S., July 23, 2024.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz/File Photo
AutomotiveElectric Vehicles (EVs)Transport

EVs, plug-in hybrids’ reliability concerns ease but still lag gas-powered peers, survey shows

EVs now have 42% more problems than their gas-powered counterparts, down from...

Drought has emptied the  Jablanicko artificial lake in Bosnia that was once a major tourist attraction for the town of Konjic (AFP)
ClimateElectricityEnvironmentHydropowerWeather

‘Scary’ drought empties one of Bosnia’s largest lakes

"The year 2024 was exceptionally bad for the functioning of the power...

Sir Keir Starmer set out his Government’s ‘plan for change’ at Pinewood Studios in Slough on Thursday (Darren Staples/PA)
ElectricityFuelNatural GasSolarWind

Starmer denies watering down green power target in new ‘plan for change’

The Labour election manifesto promised “zero-carbon electricity” — but critics say the...

Intense flooding in Europe alone caused around $10 billion in insured losses this year, Swiss Re said (AFP)
ClimateEmissionsResiliencyWeather

Natural disasters cause $310bn in economic losses in 2024: Swiss Re

It marks the fifth consecutive year that insured losses have topped $100...

Login into your Account

Please login to like, dislike or bookmark this article.