Saturday, 4 January 2025
Home Topics Business Judge in Citgo share auction rejects bid to block Gramercy fund lawsuits
BusinessCourtsLiquefied Petroleum GasNewsOilPolitics

Judge in Citgo share auction rejects bid to block Gramercy fund lawsuits

15
FILE PHOTO: A sign of Citgo Petroleum is seen at its headquarters in Houston, Texas, U.S., January 11, 2024. REUTERS/Go Nakamura/File Photo
A sign of Citgo Petroleum is seen at its headquarters in Houston, Texas, U.S., January 11, 2024. REUTERS/Go Nakamura/File Photo

HOUSTON — Lawsuits by three firms seeking to improve their chances of obtaining proceeds in an auction of shares in Citgo Petroleum’s parent can go ahead, a U.S. judge ruled in an order issued on Monday.

The decision could reduce the proceeds of any sale, the court officer overseeing the auction in federal court in Delaware had said in a motion seeking to block the parallel lawsuits. Shares in Citgo parent PDV Holding are being auctioned to repay $21 billion in claims for debt defaults and expropriations by Venezuela and state oil firm PDVSA.

PDV is a U.S. subsidiary of PDVSA and is the indirect sole stockholder of Citgo.

The three related firms — Gramercy Distressed Opportunity Fund, G&A Strategic and Girard Street Investments — brought parallel lawsuits in other courts after their claims left them unlikely to fully recoup claims in the Delaware court auction.

Gramercy declined to comment.

The court officer overseeing the auction had asked the judge to bar their Texas and New York claims, saying they could reduce bids. He had recommended bids by Elliott Investment Management affiliate Amber Energy that were contingent on an injunction being issued.

Elliott had threatened to quit the auction if the injunction was not issued. A spokesperson declined immediate comment.

U.S. District Judge Leonard Stark, who called rejecting the injunction his “least bad option,” firmly opposed the Special Master’s motion to enjoin. The special master is a court officer overseeing the auction.

The proposed motion lacks a legal basis, and evidence of new bids being prepared show the claims by Gramercy and others “are not nearly as big of a problem as the Injunction Motion portrays them,” Stark wrote.

The share auction was “never intended” to be free of a risk others might try to seize Venezuela assets. “The fundamental premise of the Special Master’s Motion, that an injunction is necessary, is unproven,” Stark wrote.

(Reporting by Gary McWilliams and Marianna Parraga; Editing by Leslie Adler)

Related Articles

In this photo taken from video released by Russian Emergency Ministry Press Service on Saturday, Jan. 4, 2025, rescuers and volunteers work to clean up tons of fuel oil that spilled out of two storm-stricken tankers more than two weeks ago in the Kerch Strait, in Russia's southern Krasnodar region. (Russian Emergency Ministry Press Service via AP)
EnvironmentFuelOil

Russia-appointed officials in Crimea declare emergency as oil spill reaches Sevastopol

Russia-occupied Crimea declares emergency after oil is detected on the peninsula's largest...

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks on securing 235 judicial confirmations, at the White House in Washington, U.S., January 2, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo
LegislationNatural GasOil

Biden to ban new oil drilling over vast areas of US Atlantic, Pacific waters

The ban, set to be announced Monday, prohibits selling drilling rights in...

FILE PHOTO: A volunteer works to clear spilled oil on the coastline following an incident involving two tankers damaged in a storm in the Kerch Strait, in the settlement of Blagoveshchenskaya near the Black Sea resort of Anapa in the Krasnodar region, Russia December 21, 2024. REUTERS/Sergey Pivovarov/File Photo
EnvironmentOilWeather

Russia clears thousands of tons of contaminated sand after Black Sea oil spill

The oil leaked from two ageing tankers that were hit by a...

Login into your Account

Please login to like, dislike or bookmark this article.