Friday, 17 January 2025
Home Topics Politics Legislation UK govt rejects ‘Sunshine Bill’ plan for solar panels on new homes
LegislationNewsSolar

UK govt rejects ‘Sunshine Bill’ plan for solar panels on new homes

7
Max Wilkinson’s said his Bill would have brought down energy bill costs (PA/Andrew Matthews)
Max Wilkinson’s said his Bill would have brought down energy bill costs. — PA/Andrew Matthews

A proposed law aiming to force housebuilders to install new solar panels on the roof of every new home has failed to get Government backing.

Housing minister Matthew Pennycook said the Government could not support Liberal Democrat Max Wilkinson’s proposals – known as the Sunshine Bill – as Labour would be formally announcing amendments to its Future Homes and Future Buildings Standards later this year.

He said making Mr Wilkinson’s New Homes (Solar Generation) Bill law would potentially slow down the construction of new homes, and add to house building costs.

Mr Pennycook said the Government was “extremely sympathetic” to the private member’s Bill’s aims, but said the Government was aiming to balance what was ambitious with what was achievable.

He said: “Our concern is that passing primary legislation that doesn’t strike that balance correctly could have a number of adverse effects, including on housing supply, the construction industry and local authorities.

“While his Bill is not inherently flawed, we’re not convinced it’s the most appropriate means of proceeding.”

Mr Pennycook said the Government would include an expanded responsibility for housebuilders to include solar panels in plans in upcoming legislation.

He added the plans will “significantly increase rooftop solar deployment”, with further details being announced as soon as he is able to.

Mr Wilkinson (Cheltenham) earlier said his proposals were a “win-win” for the planet and billpayers, adding they had received support from executives at several companies including renewables firm Ecotricity and the housebuilder Thakeham.

The Bill wanted to ensure new builds would come with solar panels equivalent to at least 40% of their ground floor area as standard.

There would have been exemptions for smaller roofs which cannot physically accommodate panels, tall buildings more than 15 storeys high, developments where panels would not prove cost-effective, and projects featuring other forms of renewable energy generation.

Mr Wilkinson said there was a “clear market preference for homes with solar panels because a relatively small proportion of the price will be rewarded with a decent payback”, and pointed to research by the MCS Foundation which showed panels on the Labour Government’s target of 1.5 million homes would bolster energy generation by the equivalent of two Sizewell C nuclear power stations (3.2 gigawatt each).

In a pun-laden introduction, he had earlier urged colleagues to support his Bill, and took inspiration from Morecambe and Wise’s Bring Me Sunshine when he said: “‘Let our arms be as warm as the sun up above’ and let us think about how ‘much joy we can bring to each brand new bright tomorrow’.”

The debate heard repeated calls from MPs for the Government to prioritise rooftop solar panels to solar farms on farmland.

Conservative former minister Wendy Morton called for alternatives in light of some areas of the green belt being designated as “grey belt”, which makes it easier to develop on.

She said: “I really fear that if we do not really thoroughly grasp the issue of where solar panels are going and battery storage and all the other renewables, we risk green belt all of a sudden in a few years’ time be then defined as grey belt and it risks being built on.”

Labour MP for North East Hertfordshire Chris Hinchliff said: “We face many challenging decisions locally to balance the need for renewable energy with the protections of our high-quality farmland, whilst also preserving and enhancing space for nature.

“So it is unsurprising that residents in North East Hertfordshire can clearly see the common sense in putting the solar panels we need on rooftops.”

But Roz Savage, the Liberal Democrat MP for South Cotswolds, called on MPs to “keep our countryside beautiful and it adds insult to injury for the people of Hullavington, Luckington and Sherston to see massive new warehouses and new homes springing up with not a solar panel in sight”.

Conservative MP Sir Roger Gale (Herne Bay and Sandwich ) said: “In east Kent, we are losing grade one agricultural land far too frequently to both development and to the use for solar power generation, and it’s completely unnecessary.

“As I’ve said many times… we have acres and acres of rooftops in public ownership on public buildings and schools, hospitals, prisons, in addition to acres of car park space.”

Related Articles

FILE PHOTO: A drone view shows a site where beachfront houses were burnt down by the Palisades Fire, in Malibu, California, U.S., January 16, 2025. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo
RegulationsUtilities

LA public utility’s wildfire liability hinges on equipment’s role, Moody’s says

Moody's says LADWP's liability for the Palisades Fire hinges on equipment involvement;...

U.S. President Joe Biden answers questions regarding talking to hostages and TikTok as he made a stop at St. John's Church before the U.S. Conference of Mayors in Washington D.C., U.S., January 17, 2025. REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon
Critical MineralsFinance

Biden boosts loan for ioneer’s Nevada lithium mine to nearly $1 billion

The U.S. DOE finalized a $996M loan for ioneer’s Rhyolite Ridge lithium...

FILE PHOTO: A coat of arms is seen on one of the original Bank of Montreal (BMO) buildings in Toronto, Ontario, Canada June 1, 2021.  REUTERS/Chris Helgren/File Photo
ClimateFinancePolitics

BMO becomes first Canadian bank to withdraw from Net-Zero Banking Alliance

BMO becomes the first Canadian bank to exit the NZBA, following similar...

Imperial Oil logo at the company's annual meeting in Calgary on April 28, 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh
OilRegulations

Alberta Energy Regulator lays nine charges against Imperial Oil for 2023 spill

Alberta charges Imperial Oil over 5.3M-litre toxic wastewater spill at Kearl site,...

Login into your Account

Please login to like, dislike or bookmark this article.